Editors. (2003). Peer review. Library & Information Science Research, 25. 359-361. I don't remember if I already used this, but it's a good description of the process.
Harrison, D. (2008). Scholarly voice and professional identity in the Internet age. Thought & Action, 24. 23-33. It's a good description of the uses of blogs and reflects on the difference between writing for popular and scholarly audiences.
Lewis, H. (2009). Not your father's censorship. Chronicle of Higher Education. An article on the potential for quasi-monopolies like google/youtube to censor.
http://www.chillingeffects.org/
article I saved about newspaper retractions of retracted medical journal articles
http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE141.pdf about using the critical incident questionaire in an online class to assess group development
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment